New
Ferries planning to start operating in December
Harbour Commisioners update no3 and Interim Safe Operating Profile - 2
December 2008
Letter from Wightlink to LTSC - 26 November 2008
Email from LTSC to Harbour Commissioners
following Wightlink Press Release - 20 November 2008
annotated with Harbour Commissioners response on 24 November 2008
New Ferries River Trials Information
Harbour Commisioners update no2 - 20 November 2008
Harbour Commissioners Update 18 November 2008
LTSC Response to Harbour
Commissioners Update - 18 November 2008
Desmond Swayne raises issue in Parliament 19
November 2008.
Wighlink
Press Release - 20 November 2008
|
|
Wightlink Newships |
Environmental Appraisal based on 1992 review |
Harbour Master River Safety guidance re existing ferries |
Wightlink Ferries Lymington Harbour Navigational Review - Dec 2006 |
LHC Terms of Reference for Ferry Operations Risk Assessment (Oct 2007) |
|
LTSC
Ferry Forum 18 October 2007 |
LTSC Position Statement
23
October 2007 |
LTSC
cover letter
19th
March 2008 |
LTSC Sea Tec response
19 March 2008 |
New Larger
Ferries |
Harbour
Commissioners - Notice to Mariners
re New Ferry Trials |
LTSC Ferry Comparison Group - Terms of
Reference |
|
Meeting LTSC, Harbourmaster & BMT - Wednesday 24th September 2008 |
W
Class Ferry Evaluation: Sunday 28 September Afternoon
- Photos |
 |
|
New Ferry Wight Light arrived during
night of 1/2 September 2008 |
 |
|
Photos (c) Adam Reay |
|
From : Richard Jenner , Commodore
LTSC
Date : 20/11/08
Dear Ryan and Peter,
Wightlinks Press Statement regarding the Introduction of the
Wight Class Ferries
Please accept my apologies for
communicating by e mail but as Peter explained in his Statement we
are now in a fast moving situation with regards to the New Ferries
so it seems appropriate. This letter and my previous e mail this
week will be copied to you as a formal letter from LTSC for the
record.
In Wightlinks Press Statement
today,20/11/08 they state that there are two outstanding trials. The
first involving dinghies requiring stronger winds than we have
experienced on scheduled trial days and a second involving the
passing of the W Class vessels in the river. They state that this
latter trial can only be carried out in specific conditions which
are likely to be some time away resulting in the indeterminate delay
of the final report.
Wightlink go on to say that ...With the
vast majority of the findings of the sea trials before us, we can
now be completely confident that the new ferries can operate safely
within the Lymington river but, until the trials are concluded, we
will work within the parameters of an "Interim Safe Operating
Profile"
The concern I must now raise again with
you is that of ferries passing in the river. The Lymington Town
Sailing Club have consistently raised this as a serious concern
particularly with regards to sailing dinghies who are regularly
overtaken by ferries at this point of the river.
Wightlinks statements says that they
have decided their ferries are safe to operate but no trials have
been conducted on what must be the most hazardous occurrence in the
river. That of two new larger ferries passing in the proximity of
small sailing dinghies .
Could you please advise us whether it is
the LHC who will set the "Interim Safe Operating Profile" or is it
Wightlink setting there own conditions.
I would strongly recommend that this
Interim Safe Operating Profile should prohibit the passing of
ferries in the river until such time as the trials have proven it to
be a safe occurrence in the presence of small sailing dinghies.
The current situation is the cause of
some alarm to LTSC and we would request an early meeting with you so
that we may be acquainted with the detail of the "Interim Safe
Operating Profile" as soon as you are in a position to brief us.
Yours sincerely
Richard Jenner
Commodore LTSC |
LTSC Response to Harbour Commissioner's Update - 18 November 2008
and Response by Harbour Commissioners on 24 November
To Richard Jenner
Subject: RE: LHC Statment
Dear Richard,
Peter & I have attempted to answer your questions – please see
italics under each point.
Regards,
Peter Griffiths Chairman
Ryan Willegers – Harbour Master
To : Peter Griffiths and Ryan Willegers.
I am most
concerned on reading LHC statement headed " New Ferry Trials
Information update to stakeholders"
In the
introduction LHC state that essential trials for the completion of
BMTs analysis has yet to be completed.
You also state
that your trials to date have indicated some areas of concern with
regards to the potential effect of the ferries on other river users.
It is alarming
that you state that when you met Wightlink to discuss these concerns
you were in your words seriously disappointed by Wightlinks response
during the meeting and in subsequent correspondence.
I am shocked to
learn that they are refusing to support the trials to there
conclusion and that they have decided that their operation is safe
and that they will commence operating their new ferries before
the trials are complete.
In the
circumstances I believe there are a number of questions I must ask
in order that LTSC members can be accurately appraised of the
situation.
1: Presumably
this means that Wightlink intend to operate without the completion
of an independent risk assessment and contrary to the requirements
of LHC ?
Wightlink have subsequently issued a press release on the 20th
November indicating that they intend to introduce their vessels this
year but that they will work in accordance with an ‘interim’ safe
operating profile.
This profile will be determined by LHC based on our advice from
BMT SeaTech. Our stakeholder update No. 2 refers.
2: Is this
action by Wightlink legal ? Whilst it is acknowledged that the
Harbour is an open port is there not a legal requirement to ensure
that a risk assessment is completed before a scheduled operation can
commence ?
There is a requirement for a risk assessment to be undertaken,
however we also have an ‘Open Port’ duty. Based on the trials that
have been undertaken thus far, we are not in a position where the
vessel cannot safely use the river under any circumstances. If we
were, then we could not have allowed the crew training and risk
assessment trials to continue. That said, BMT have not yet completed
all of the trials and therefore without having all of the data
before us, the risk assessment and the terms under which the new
vessels can operate on an interim basis will need to necessarily be
precautionary in nature. I should also refer you to our Stakeholder
Update No 2 which illustrates the actions we are taking to ensure
that we fully discharge our statutory duties.
3: Given that
results of trials to date have indicated some areas of concern
should these not now be made public along with LHC ideas as to how
these could be mitigated.
The areas of concern raised with
Wightlink relate to the operation
of the aft thruster unit in the higher of the two power settings
available to them. Our discussions around how these concerns may be
mitigated include, 1) the need for the aft thruster to be used in
the lower power setting when in the river – this will require a wind
speed limitation. 2) investigation of the possibility of making a
modification to give an intermediate power setting which can be used
in higher wind speeds but this will require further trials.
4: Would LHC
agree that Wightlink appear to be riding rough shod over the safety
interests of other river users to support their own commercial
interests.
We think our Stakeholder briefings of the 18th and 20th
November summarise our views.
As you are aware
Lymington Town Sailing Club have always expressed their concern at
the possible effect of the new ferries on other river users
particularly those in small craft. We have also made it clear that
we fully support the respective authorities, in this case LHC to
ensure that the interests of small boat users are protected.
Our position
remains unchanged but we must also point out that we will resist any
restrictions on our Club activities believing that inspite of
Wightlinks high handed response they will be required by the
regulatory authorities to operate safely in the Lymington river
without inhibiting the long established activities of our Club
members
|
|
New Ferries
River Trials Information Update to Stakeholders
Harbour Commissioners - 18 November 2008
Introduction
Much work has now
been completed over the last two months and most measured data is now
with the BMT Seatech risk assessment team for detailed analysis.
A final trial with
dinghies will be held on Wednesday 19 November if the wind is
suitable.
We have not yet
completed the trials with two W class vessels passing on their
transits. This requires a wind of F5/6 from the SW and a full range of
tides from HW, Mid tide and LW springs.
This work is
essential if BMT are to be able to complete their analysis in
accordance with their terms of reference and produce a draft report by
Mid December as expected.
Areas of Concern
The results to date
have indicated some areas of concern with regard to the potential
effect of the ferries on other river users.
In order to address
these concerns ahead of the draft report we met with Wightlink last
week to discuss them, and to attempt to find ways in which they could
be mitigated.
However, we were
seriously disappointed by Wightlink’s response both during the meeting
and in subsequent correspondence received.
This is because:
- They now inform us
that, contrary to their previous position, they can operate a
commercial service without the need to modify the loading
arrangements.
- They have stated
that they will not support the trials to their full conclusion in
advance of commencing commercial service.
- They have informed
us that, prior to the completion of the risk assessment process they
“consider it to be entirely safe for the Wight Class vessels to now
enter service, and as stated at the meeting, we will be progressing
plans for their introduction in early December”
Harbour Commissioners Action
We considered
Wightlink’s response at our Commissioners meeting on Monday afternoon
and agreed unanimously the following immediate and urgent actions.
- To consult with
BMT Seatech for them to provide an evidence based interim Safe
Operating Profile for the W Class, based on the information that
they have gathered to date and the concerns identified. This must of
necessity be based on precautionary principals given the incomplete
nature of the trials.
- To consult with
the environmental regulators to speed up the provision of their
environmental advice.
- To inform the MCA
and the Department for Transport of our concerns regarding
Wightlink’s stated plans.
- To consult with
our legal advisors to ensure that we have identified the most
effective way in which to enforce an interim safe operating profile.
- To advise
Wightlink of the action that we are taking and ensure that they
fully appreciate our determination to regulate for the safety of
navigation and protection of the environment, in accordance with our
powers and duties under the Port Marine Safety Code.
This is likely to be
a fast moving situation and we will keep you informed of any
significant developments as appropriate.
Peter Griffiths
Chairman – Lymington
Harbour Commission
18th
November 2008
|
|
Harbour
Commissioners - Notice to Mariners re New Ferry Trials |
|
New Ferry
W
Class Ferry Evaluation: Sunday 28 September Afternoon
There is an
opportunity this Sunday for members to take their boats on the river
to observe the new Ferry and to help ensure that the river is as busy
as possible. This is to ensure that BMT (the consultants commissioned
by Lymington Harbour Commissioners) can see what the river is like at
busy times. Ideally they would like to see both keel boats and dinghy
sailors on the water.
The plan is for the
W Class Ferry to
undertake sailings at 13.45, 15.15, and 16.45 from Lymington and
14.30, 16.00 and 17.30 from Yarmouth. Depending on conditions there
may also be an 18.15 sailing from Lymington. The reason Sunday
afternoon has been chosen is because it provides an opportunity to
assess the position over a LWS tide which will increase the congestion
factor.
LTSC is forming a
Ferry Comparison Group to
assess the differences between the impact of W and C Class ferries on
small boats in the river. Any member is welcome to provide details of
their observations regarding the impact of either ferry on their boats
whilst the Ferry is in the River. Please indicate date, type of boat
you were in, wind strength, state of tide and position in river and
your observation. Please forward any observations to the Sailing
Secretary.
The Harbour Master
has requested that we remind all members that any incident on the
river between any boats or with any river marks should be reported to
the Harbour master as they now have sophisticated recording and
analyses systems to monitor numbers and types of incident. The report
can be verbally to the Harbour Master office.
Thank you in
anticipation
Richard Jenner
Commodore |
|
Extract from
Telltales
Well we have now all seen the new Wightlink vessel in the river and
can form our own opinions.
On Wednesday 24th September 2008, I met with BMT Sea Tech and
Lymington Harbour Commissioners to discuss BMT’s response to the
Club's observations on the proposed Phase 2 trials. I was accompanied
by Richard Phillips and Barry Dutton from our Sailing Committee and
Richard Russell who is a member of the Club's working group charged
with evaluating the possible effects of the new vessels on the Club
activities. The meeting was lengthy and covered aspects of concern to
the Club. Minutes of this meeting are being prepared by Ian Dand of
BMT and we will add any points of clarification which we see fit.
Overall the views and
points made by the Club were taken on board and assurances were again
given that LHC’s objective was to ensure that if at all possible any
restrictions/controls introduced as a result of the resulting risk
assessment will be upon Wightlink and not leisure river users.
LTSC were informed that at
present there is no evidence that the area of the river where the
ferries pass has a higher number of incidents than any other part of
the river.
The Harbour Master
stressed the need for any incident in the river, whether it be with
the ferry or not, to be reported to the LHC. Incidents are
categorised by LHC and recorded so that a profile of incidents and
their location on the river can be established.
It was agreed with the
Harbour Master and BMT that LTSC would provide some experienced dinghy
sailors to assist with the comparison of the effects of the W and C
Class ferries on various types of dinghies sailing in the river. An
LTSC Ferry Comparison Group is being set up by the Sailing Committee
to assist in this.
In addition it was agreed
that any member of LTSC may provide feedback to the Sailing Committee
about their experiences with the new Ferry.
Currently the Ferry trials
are taking place on Tuesday’s and Thursday’s, other times will be
notified by the Harbourmaster
Richard Jenner
Commodore. |
LTSC response to BMT SEATEC Phase 1 Report
LTSC has reviewed the
report, but remains very concerned about the probable impact on small
boats. Specifically:
1. The report does not
adequately address the concerns of small boat users, such as the young
and the inexperienced sailors, canoeists and rowers who have
traditionally used the river for leisure.
2. We are concerned that
some small boat users may be leaving the river due to their perceived
fears and concerns about the impact of larger ferries. This will have a
detrimental effect on the clubs and organisations, as well as Lymington
in general.
3. The report discusses the
practice of ferries passing in the river, but does not adequately
address the risks to all river users, ferries included. The suggestion
that "waiting in the river" should be an exception does not reflect our
experience. It is evident that this practice can lead to irregular ferry
speeds that make predictions of the ferry position by other river users
very difficult. This risk is significantly increased at low water when
many vessels, including sailing dinghies, are restricted by draft.
4. LTSC remains opposed to
allowing ferries to pass in the River.
LTSC is committed to working
with LHC in its efforts to establish safe operating procedures for the
larger ferries. However, we cannot accept that our longstanding boating
activities on the river should be changed or threatened by the
introduction of larger vessels.
Richard
Jenner
Commodore
7 April 2008 |
|
New Larger Ferries
The first phase assessment carried out for the Lymington Harbour
Commissioners by BMT has now been published. A working group consisting
of Nigel Walbank, Keith Wicks and Robin Dent have reviewed the document
on behalf of the Club and submitted comments to LHC. A meeting was held
at the RLymYC attended by representatives of all interested parties
where both LHC and BMT listened to the comments and concerns of LTSC and
other parties.
The
Executive have agreed that a picture display giving an impression of the
new boats in the river can be shown in the Lower Deck bar. These
pictures have been prepared by Robin Dent on the basis of the data he
has acquired, the club can take no responsibility for the accuracy but
interested members are encouraged to speak directly with Robin.
In April The Solent Protection Society is holding a meeting at Elmers
Court to which Adam and I have been invited. This meeting with
representatives from over 25 different bodies and organisation both IOW
and Lymington will also be attended by local MPs and Councillors. The
objective as stated is to Brief and take questions
Richard Jenner LTSC
Commodore
Extract from Telltales April 2008
|
|
LTSC Position
Statement on the New Ferries
Lymington Town Sailing Club is concerned at
the introduction of larger commercial vessels into the river, such as
Wightlink’s new ‘R’ Class ferries, as these larger vessels could have an
adverse effect upon leisure river-users, particularly upon small sailing
dinghies, rowing boats and canoes.
The Club welcomes the risk assessment on the
new vessels that is to be arranged by the Lymington Harbour
Commissioners (LHC) and will continue to work with and support them. We
trust that they will take effective action to ensure that leisure
river-users are not adversely affected. LTSC feel strongly that, in
addition to the measures to restrict the speed of the new ferries, it is
imperative that these larger vessels pass one another in the open waters
of the Western Solent, not in the river.
In the event that the LHC should seek to
introduce measures restricting the LTSC's activities in the river the
Club will resist these, as it believes that any restrictions on
navigation should be borne by those seeking to introduce larger vessels.
If, in the final analysis, such restrictions
on the larger vessels are inadequate to ensure the safety of all
river-users, LTSC consider this would be sufficient justification to
challenge the entry of larger ferries into the river.
Peter Upcher
Commodore
23 October 2007 |